The Governance of Republic State and The Governance of Monarchy State

The definition of governance is devided into two parts, in general and specific. In general, the governance is the command’s activity that is done by legislative, executive, and yudicative in order to get the target of management state. In specific, the governance is the command’s activity that it done by executive and its overall in order to get the target of  management state. There are two of all governance in this comparison and contrast essay. They are the governance of the republic state and the governance of the monarchy state. There are three of many comparison that will be expained.

              The first point is about the governance’s leader. The leader of republic is a president, someone who has been chosen by the all society in a state, to lead the governance in several years. Actually, a president does not work only by himself/herself to make decisions in a state, he/she is helped by its overall that is called executive, they are a vice president and ministers. They will be replaced after a period of time. In the other hand, the leader of monarchy is a  king/queen, somone who has been chosen by the family kingdom  not the all society because of  his/her kingdom’s clan, until he/she gives the recomandation to the other kingdom’s clan. In this monarchy state, it does not have the governments, who lead the governance in making decisions, like in republic system. It is only a king/queen  who lead the governance and make decisions; even though there are some prime ministers and kingdom’s consultans, but they are not getting much of it.

The other perception is about democracy and human rights. Democracy and human rights are in one part, which can not be separated. Democracy is the governance by the people, from the people, and for the people. Democracy is a system in making decisions. Human rights is the personal property such as the right of independence pers, the right in giving opinions, and the right to choose and been choosen as society. In republic state, everything about the governance decisions are taken by the all society; the human rights of people is very respected. This moment usually happens in general election to elect a president , a vice president, and its executive in governance. Mean while in monarchy state, there is no democration because all the decision is taken by the king/ queen. There is any human rights, but it is limited by the king/queen. They may use it for the good opinions not for bad ones.

The final point is the leader’s ability and condition in leading state. In republic state for applying the democracy system, it has an adversity and a weakness in leading because there are many critical society about the problems in the governance. This is the hard way for the governments to solve the problems; and sometimes, it lead to a conflict that ended by fighting and destroying the government’s buildings from the society. In monarchy state, it is easy for the leader to handle his/her society because if there is someone who is opposing the governments in governance, he/ she will be in jail or die.

The conclusion, republic state and monarchy state are the kind of  state,  which are very different in governance. The republic state is led by a president and monarchy state is led by the king/queen. The system in republic state is democracy and respecting human rights, but  monarchy state is less in respecting even nothing. Besides that, the monarchy state is better than the republic state in handling the governance and society. That is all about the comparison between the governance of the republic state and the governance of the monarchy state.